Risk / WORKSHOP
Position size: define the loss before the quantity
The same entry can represent moderate or excessive risk. Quantity often makes the difference.

How it works
Planned loss = fixed round-trip costs + quantity × (monetary price risk per unit + variable round-trip costs per unit). Choose invalidation first, then find an allowed quantity within the budget.
Every number below is hypothetical, educational and in the account currency; none is a market quote or broker fee. For lots and derivatives, convert protective distance to money using the contract specification and tick value. With a simple linear fee model, subtract fixed costs from the budget, divide the remainder by unit risk plus variable costs, then round down on the permitted quantity grid. Here the minimum and increment are both 5; a different minimum requires the broker’s actual grid. Minimum commissions, tiered fees and currency conversion require a full-cost check after rounding. Do not count the same spread twice: if it is already reflected in execution prices, do not add it again.
What to check
- Set the monetary budget and invalidation level; check the specification and settlement currency.
- Separate round-trip expenses into fixed and variable costs.
- Round down on the allowed quantity grid and recalculate total planned loss; check the next larger quantity.
A hypothetical example
Hypothetical budget 100; monetary price risk per unit 2; variable round-trip costs per unit 0.1; fixed round-trip costs 4. The remainder is 96; 96 / 2.1 ≈ 45.71. With a minimum and increment of 5, the maximum is 45: 4 + 45 × 2.1 = 98.5. Counterexample: rounding to 50 gives 4 + 50 × 2.1 = 109, exceeding the budget. If the estimated price risk rises to 2.5 before sending the order, recalculate: 96 / 2.6 ≈ 36.92; the maximum is 35 and planned loss is 95. Quantity 40 would give 108. If the minimum allowed quantity is 50, no quantity fits.
When to skip
Skip if fixed costs exhaust the budget, the minimum quantity exceeds it, or the specification, conversion and complete fee schedule cannot be verified.
Rounding up, forgetting a fixed commission and double-counting the spread distort risk. Margin is not the loss. A stop order does not guarantee execution price: gaps or slippage can make the actual loss exceed the planned amount.
Try it yourself
Build a hypothetical table for quantities 35, 40, 45 and 50. Separately calculate fixed costs + quantity × price risk including variable costs. Change the protective distance and recalculate; do not move invalidation to fit the desired quantity.
Hypothetical budget 100, monetary price risk 2 per unit, variable round-trip costs 0.1 per unit, fixed round-trip costs 4; minimum and increment 5. Find the maximum quantity and explain why 50 does not fit.
Show explanation
(100 − 4) / (2 + 0.1) ≈ 45.71; round down by increments of 5 to 45. Total planned loss is 98.5. The next quantity, 50, gives 109 > 100. This uses the hypothetical fee model; it is not a guaranteed limit on the actual loss.
Choose invalidation and the monetary budget first, then expenses and the allowed quantity grid; check total planned loss after rounding.
Sources and definitions
CME Group: Proper Position Size ↗SEC Investor.gov: Understanding Order Types ↗Scenarios and exercises are educational FINBORS examples, not a verified trading strategy.